William Chandler v. B. J. Robert

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999303981-2] Originating case number: 1:13-cv-01115-GBL-IDD Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999364666]. Mailed to: Chandler. [14-6138]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-6138 Doc: 18 Filed: 05/29/2014 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-6138 WILLIAM L. CHANDLER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. B. J. ROBERTS, Sheriff, Defendant – Appellee, and GEORGE M. ROGERS, III, Commonwealth Attorney, Attorney at Law; ANTHON BELL, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (1:13-cv-01115-GBL-IDD) Submitted: May 22, 2014 Before TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Chief Decided: May 29, 2014 Judge, and HAMILTON and DAVIS, Senior Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William L. Chandler, Appellant Pro Se. Samuel Lawrence Dumville, NORRIS & ST. CLAIR P.C., Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 14-6138 Doc: 18 Filed: 05/29/2014 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: William L. Chandler appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (2012), and he has filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. no reversible error. motion to proceed court’s orders. in We have reviewed the record and find Accordingly, although we grant Chandler’s forma pauperis, we affirm the district Chandler v. Roberts, No. 1:13-cv-01115-GBL-IDD (E.D. Va. Oct. 28, 2013; Dec. 19, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?