William Chandler v. B. J. Robert
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999303981-2] Originating case number: 1:13-cv-01115-GBL-IDD Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999364666]. Mailed to: Chandler. [14-6138]
Appeal: 14-6138
Doc: 18
Filed: 05/29/2014
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6138
WILLIAM L. CHANDLER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
B. J. ROBERTS, Sheriff,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
GEORGE M. ROGERS, III,
Commonwealth Attorney,
Attorney
at
Law;
ANTHON
BELL,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District
Judge. (1:13-cv-01115-GBL-IDD)
Submitted:
May 22, 2014
Before TRAXLER,
Circuit Judges.
Chief
Decided: May 29, 2014
Judge,
and
HAMILTON
and
DAVIS,
Senior
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William L. Chandler, Appellant Pro Se.
Samuel Lawrence
Dumville, NORRIS & ST. CLAIR P.C., Virginia Beach, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-6138
Doc: 18
Filed: 05/29/2014
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
William
L.
Chandler
appeals
the
district
court’s
orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action, pursuant
to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (2012), and he has filed a motion to
proceed in forma pauperis.
no reversible error.
motion
to
proceed
court’s orders.
in
We have reviewed the record and find
Accordingly, although we grant Chandler’s
forma
pauperis,
we
affirm
the
district
Chandler v. Roberts, No. 1:13-cv-01115-GBL-IDD
(E.D. Va. Oct. 28, 2013; Dec. 19, 2013).
We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?