Monte Winston v. US
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:11-cv-00812-REP Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999340693]. Mailed to: M. Winston. [14-6189]
Appeal: 14-6189
Doc: 10
Filed: 04/22/2014
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6189
MONTE DECARLOS WINSTON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; K. ANDERSON, DHD acting on behalf
of Federal Bureau of Prisons,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
Robert E. Payne, Senior
District Judge. (3:11-cv-00812-REP)
Submitted:
April 17, 2014
Decided:
April 22, 2014
Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Monte Decarlos Winston, Appellant Pro Se.
Jonathan Holland
Hambrick, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia,
for Appellee.
Appeal: 14-6189
Doc: 10
Filed: 04/22/2014
Pg: 2 of 3
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 14-6189
Doc: 10
Filed: 04/22/2014
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Monte
orders
granting
dismissing
Decarlos
summary
Winston’s
Winston
appeals
judgment
complaint
to
filed
the
district
the
United
under
the
court’s
States
Federal
and
Tort
Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671-2680 (2012), and denying Winston’s
Fed. R. Civ. P. 60 motion for relief from judgment.
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
We have
Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
See
Winston v. United States, No. 3:11-cv-00812-REP (E.D. Va. Sept.
10, 2013 & Jan. 27, 2014).
We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?