US v. Deonza Carmichael

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999299253-2] Originating case number: 5:08-cr-00229-FL-2, 5:12-cv-00288-FL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999595904].. [14-6205]

Appeal: 14-6205

Doc: 20

Filed: 06/04/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6205

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
DEONZA LAMAR CARMICHAEL,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:08-cr-00229-FL-2; 5:12-cv-00288-FL)

Submitted:

May 28, 2015

Decided:

June 4, 2015

Before KING and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Deonza
Lamar
Carmichael,
Appellant
Pro
Se.
Jennifer
P.
May-Parker, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-6205

Doc: 20

Filed: 06/04/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Deonza Lamar Carmichael appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion.
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

We have

Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

United

States v. Carmichael, No. 5:08-cr-00229-FL-2; 5:12-cv-00288-FL
(E.D.N.C.

Feb.

6,

2014);

see

also

United

States

v.

Foote,

__F.3d__, 2015 WL 1883538 (4th Cir. Apr. 27, 2015), petition for
cert. filed (May 12, 2015) (No. 14-9792).

We deny Carmichael’s

motion

dispense

for

appointment

of

counsel

and

with

oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2