US v. Albert Iaquinta

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:98-hc-00764-BR Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999416317]. [14-6236]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-6236 Doc: 26 Filed: 08/15/2014 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-6236 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Petitioner – Appellee, v. ALBERT F. IAQUINTA, Respondent - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (5:98-hc-00764-BR) Submitted: July 31, 2014 Decided: August 15, 2014 Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James B. Craven, III, Durham, North Carolina, for Appellant. Thomas G. Walker, United States Attorney, R.A. Renfer, Jr., Robert J. Dodson, Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 14-6236 Doc: 26 Filed: 08/15/2014 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Albert F. Iaquinta appeals the district court’s order denying his § 4247(h) motion (West for 2012 should be discharged. reversible error. order. legal before & a hearing Supp. pursuant 2014) to to 18 determine U.S.C.A. whether he We have reviewed the record and find no Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions this court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?