US v. Albert Iaquinta
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:98-hc-00764-BR Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999416317]. [14-6236]
Appeal: 14-6236
Doc: 26
Filed: 08/15/2014
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6236
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Petitioner – Appellee,
v.
ALBERT F. IAQUINTA,
Respondent - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
W. Earl Britt, Senior
District Judge. (5:98-hc-00764-BR)
Submitted:
July 31, 2014
Decided:
August 15, 2014
Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James B. Craven, III, Durham, North Carolina, for Appellant.
Thomas G. Walker, United States Attorney, R.A. Renfer, Jr.,
Robert J. Dodson, Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh,
North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-6236
Doc: 26
Filed: 08/15/2014
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Albert F. Iaquinta appeals the district court’s order
denying
his
§ 4247(h)
motion
(West
for
2012
should be discharged.
reversible error.
order.
legal
before
&
a
hearing
Supp.
pursuant
2014)
to
to
18
determine
U.S.C.A.
whether
he
We have reviewed the record and find no
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions
this
court
are
adequately
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
aid
the
the
materials
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?