US v. Nicholas J. Queen

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:93-cr-00366-WMN-1. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999379064]. Mailed to: Nicholas Queen. [14-6293]

Appeal: 14-6293

Doc: 12

Filed: 06/19/2014

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6293

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
NICHOLAS JAMES QUEEN,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
William N. Nickerson, Senior District
Judge. (1:93-cr-00366-WMN-1)

Submitted:

June 17, 2014

Decided:

June 19, 2014

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nicholas James Queen,
Cunningham,
Assistant
Maryland, for Appellee.

Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Paul Michael
United
States
Attorney,
Baltimore,

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-6293

Doc: 12

Filed: 06/19/2014

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Nicholas

James

Queen,

Sr.,

appeals

the

district

court’s order denying his motions for new trial, to amend, for
reconsideration of the court’s January 28, 2013, order, and for
relief from the court’s May 8, 1997, order.
the record and find no reversible error.

We have reviewed

Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court.

United States v.

Queen,

11,

2014).

facts

and

legal

materials

before

No.

dispense

1:93-cr-00366-WMN-1

with

contentions

are

oral

argument

adequately

(D.

Md.

because

presented

in

Feb.
the
the

We

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2