Monte Winston v. US AG
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999340078-2] Originating case number: 3:12-cv-00172-REP Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999406936]. Mailed to: Monte Wilson. [14-6307]
Appeal: 14-6307
Doc: 18
Filed: 07/31/2014
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6307
MONTE DECARLOS WINSTON,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
Robert E. Payne, Senior
District Judge. (3:12-cv-00172-REP)
Submitted:
July 29, 2014
Decided:
July 31, 2014
Before NIEMEYER, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Monte Decarlos Winston, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-6307
Doc: 18
Filed: 07/31/2014
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Monte
the
district
release,
Decarlos
court’s
which
was
Winston,
order
filed
a
denying
after
the
federal
his
prisoner,
motion
district
Winston’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition.
the record and find no reversible error.
appeals
for
immediate
court
dismissed
We have reviewed
Accordingly, although
we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the
reasons
stated
by
the
district
court.
See
Winston
v.
U.S.
Attorney Gen., No. 3:12-cv-00172-REP (E.D. Va. Jan. 27, 2014).
We
dispense
contentions
with
are
oral
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
facts
and
the
materials
legal
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?