Monte Winston v. US AG

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999340078-2] Originating case number: 3:12-cv-00172-REP Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999406936]. Mailed to: Monte Wilson. [14-6307]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-6307 Doc: 18 Filed: 07/31/2014 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-6307 MONTE DECARLOS WINSTON, Petitioner - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:12-cv-00172-REP) Submitted: July 29, 2014 Decided: July 31, 2014 Before NIEMEYER, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Monte Decarlos Winston, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 14-6307 Doc: 18 Filed: 07/31/2014 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Monte the district release, Decarlos court’s which was Winston, order filed a denying after the federal his prisoner, motion district Winston’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. the record and find no reversible error. appeals for immediate court dismissed We have reviewed Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Winston v. U.S. Attorney Gen., No. 3:12-cv-00172-REP (E.D. Va. Jan. 27, 2014). We dispense contentions with are oral argument adequately because presented in the facts and the materials legal before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?