Alexander Matthews v. Ted Hull
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:13-cv-00450-LO-JFA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999385703]. Mailed to: Matthews. [14-6310]
Appeal: 14-6310
Doc: 14
Filed: 06/30/2014
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6310
ALEXANDER OTIS MATTHEWS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
TED HULL; R. MICHELLE LEWIS; MARTIN, Sergeant; JOHN
DOE/JANE DOE RECREATION SUPERVISOR; JOHN DOE/JANE DOE
DIRECTOR OF MEDICAL SERVICES; JOHN DOE/JANE DOE CLEANING
SUPERVISOR; JOHN DOE/JANE DOE FOOD SERVICES SUPERVISOR;
JOHN DOE/JANE DOE UNIT NURSE; NORTHERN NECK REGIONAL JAIL
BOARD AUTHORITY MEMBERS; LYNN SUDDUTH,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
District Judge. (1:13-cv-00450-LO-JFA)
Submitted:
June 26, 2014
Decided: June 30, 2014
Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Alexander Matthews, Appellant Pro Se. Broderick Coleman Dunn,
Alexander Francuzenko, COOK CRAIG & FRANCUZENKO, PLLC, Fairfax,
Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-6310
Doc: 14
Filed: 06/30/2014
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Alexander Matthews appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915A(b) (2012).
reversible error.
We have reviewed the record and find no
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court.
Matthews v. Hull, No. 1:13-cv-00450-LO-
JFA (E.D. Va. Feb. 12, 2014).
We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?