David Atkins v. Bobbie Joe

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999335431-2]; denying Motion for requesting records [999370356-2], denying Motion to add defendants to appeal [999383279-2] Originating case number: 1:13-cv-00212-LMB-IDD Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999403638]. Mailed to: David Atkins. [14-6328]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-6328 Doc: 30 Filed: 07/28/2014 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-6328 DAVID ATKINS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BOBBIE JOE, Head MCCABE, Sheriff, Nurse; MR. CARTER, doctor; ROBERT T. Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:13-cv-00212-LMB-IDD) Submitted: July 24, 2014 Before FLOYD and Circuit Judge. THACKER, Decided: July 28, 2014 Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David Atkins, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 14-6328 Doc: 30 Filed: 07/28/2014 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: David Atkins, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. have reviewed the record Accordingly, although pauperis, affirm court. we we for and find the reversible leave grant no to proceed reasons stated by error. in the We forma district Atkins v. Bobbie Joe, No. 1:13-cv-00212-LMB-IDD (E.D. Va. filed Jan. 30, 2014, entered Feb. 3, 2014). Atkins’ motions requesting the denied. legal before records and to add defendants to appeal are We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions this court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?