Kenneth Newkirk v. Norma Capp
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:13-cv-00074-HEH. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999403773]. Mailed to: Kenneth Newkirk. [14-6387]
Appeal: 14-6387
Doc: 13
Filed: 07/28/2014
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6387
KENNETH H. NEWKIRK,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
NORMA JEAN CAPP, Ms., Magistrate, Issue Search Warrants;
ROBERT LITTLE, Mr., Detective, Solve Mysteries; R. MAYER,
Mr., Detective-Detective,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (3:13-cv-00074-HEH)
Submitted:
July 24, 2014
Before FLOYD and
Circuit Judge.
THACKER,
Decided: July 28, 2014
Circuit
Judges,
and
DAVIS,
Senior
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kenneth H. Newkirk, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-6387
Doc: 13
Filed: 07/28/2014
Pg: 2 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Kenneth H. Newkirk appeals the district court’s order
directing
him
to
particularize
his
42
U.S.C.
§ 1983
(2012)
complaint and denying his motion for appointment of counsel.
We may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders
and
certain
interlocutory
and
collateral
orders.
Cohen
Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 546 (1949).
v.
When a
notice of appeal is premature, the jurisdictional defect can be
cured if the district court enters a final judgment prior to our
consideration of the appeal under the doctrine of cumulative
finality.
Equip. Fin. Grp., Inc. v. Traverse Computer Brokers,
973
345,
F.2d
premature
347-48
finality
notices
rule;
of
(4th
appeal
instead,
this
Cir.
are
1992).
subject
doctrine
However,
to
applies
the
not
all
cumulative
only
when
the
appellant appeals from an order that the district court could
have certified for immediate appeal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b).
In re Bryson, 406 F.3d 284, 287-89 (4th Cir. 2005).
from
“clearly
Newkirk
finality.
seeks
interlocutory
to
Id.
appeal,
at
288
decision[s],”
cannot
(internal
be
such
saved
quotation
as
under
marks
Appeals
the
one
cumulative
omitted).
Accordingly, although the district court has entered its final
order dismissing Newkirk’s action, we dismiss Newkirk’s appeal
as interlocutory.
2
Appeal: 14-6387
Doc: 13
Filed: 07/28/2014
Pg: 3 of 3
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal
before
contentions
this
court
are
adequately
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
aid
the
the
materials
decisional
process.
DISMISSED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?