US v. Amanda Deese

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999330713-2] Originating case number: 2:12-cr-00110-RBS-LRL-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999403662]. Mailed to: Amanda Deese. [14-6442]

Appeal: 14-6442

Doc: 7

Filed: 07/28/2014

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6442

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
AMANDA DEESE,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief
District Judge. (2:12-cr-00110-RBS-LRL-1)

Submitted:

July 24, 2014

Before FLOYD and
Circuit Judge.

THACKER,

Decided: July 28, 2014

Circuit

Judges,

and

DAVIS,

Senior

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Amanda Deese, Appellant Pro Se.
Alan Mark Salsbury, Assistant
United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-6442

Doc: 7

Filed: 07/28/2014

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Amanda

Deese

appeals

the

district

court’s

order

denying her motion to correct her sentence to reduce the amount
of restitution she owes and to reduce her Guidelines offense
level.

We

have

error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court.

reviewed

the

record

and

find

no

reversible

United States v. Deese, No. 2:12-cr-00110-RBS-

LRL-1 (E.D. Va. Mar. 7, 2014).

We grant Deese’s motion to

proceed in forma pauperis on appeal.

We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2