George Porterfield v. William Byars, Jr.

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999340051-2] Originating case number: 9:13-cv-00497-JMC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999421909]. Mailed to: George Porterfield. [14-6491]--[Edited 08/25/2014 by JQ]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-6491 Doc: 14 Filed: 08/25/2014 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-6491 GEORGE PORTERFIELD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. AGENCY DIRECTOR WILLIAM R. BYARS, JR.; DR. JOHN TOMARCHIO; WARDEN LARRY CARTLEDGE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. J. Michelle Childs, District Judge. (9:13-cv-00497-JMC) Submitted: August 21, 2014 Decided: August 25, 2014 Before SHEDD, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. George Porterfield, Appellant Pro Se. MCDONALD, PATRICK, POSTON, HEMPHILL & South Carolina, for Appellees. Steven Michael Pruitt, ROPER, LLC, Greenwood, Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 14-6491 Doc: 14 Filed: 08/25/2014 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: George Porterfield appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. we affirm Porterfield for v. the reasons Byars, No. stated by the 9:13-cv-00497-JMC Accordingly, district (D.S.C. before this court and argument presented would not in aid counsel 28, We dispense with oral argument because the facts and adequately of Feb. denied. are appointment court. Porterfield’s contentions for have 2014). legal motion We the the is materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?