George Porterfield v. William Byars, Jr.
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999340051-2] Originating case number: 9:13-cv-00497-JMC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999421909]. Mailed to: George Porterfield. [14-6491]--[Edited 08/25/2014 by JQ]
Appeal: 14-6491
Doc: 14
Filed: 08/25/2014
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6491
GEORGE PORTERFIELD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
AGENCY DIRECTOR WILLIAM R. BYARS, JR.; DR. JOHN TOMARCHIO;
WARDEN LARRY CARTLEDGE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Beaufort.
J. Michelle Childs, District
Judge. (9:13-cv-00497-JMC)
Submitted:
August 21, 2014
Decided:
August 25, 2014
Before SHEDD, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
George Porterfield, Appellant Pro Se.
MCDONALD, PATRICK, POSTON, HEMPHILL &
South Carolina, for Appellees.
Steven Michael Pruitt,
ROPER, LLC, Greenwood,
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-6491
Doc: 14
Filed: 08/25/2014
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
George Porterfield appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief
on
his
42
U.S.C.
§ 1983
(2012)
complaint.
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
we
affirm
Porterfield
for
v.
the
reasons
Byars,
No.
stated
by
the
9:13-cv-00497-JMC
Accordingly,
district
(D.S.C.
before
this
court
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
aid
counsel
28,
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
adequately
of
Feb.
denied.
are
appointment
court.
Porterfield’s
contentions
for
have
2014).
legal
motion
We
the
the
is
materials
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?