Robert Herbert v. Benjamin Treaster
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:13-cv-00262-JFA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999421997]. Mailed to: Robert Herbert. [14-6496]
Appeal: 14-6496
Doc: 17
Filed: 08/25/2014
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6496
ROBERT FLETCHER HERBERT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BENJAMIN F. TREASTER; DARYL SCOTT BARBER,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
SHERIFF JAMES MET; ARTHUR L. MYERS; BRIAN WESLEY JEFFCOAT;
DEANDRE BALL; DATRAIL BALL,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (3:13-cv-00262-JFA)
Submitted:
August 14, 2014
Decided:
August 25, 2014
Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Fletcher Herbert, Appellant Pro Se.
William Henry
Davidson, II, David Allan DeMasters, DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, PA,
Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Appeal: 14-6496
Doc: 17
Filed: 08/25/2014
Pg: 2 of 3
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 14-6496
Doc: 17
Filed: 08/25/2014
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Robert Fletcher Herbert appeals the district court’s
order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
granting summary judgment to Defendants Benjamin F. Treaster and
Daryl Scott Barber in his civil action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(2012).
error.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
district
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
court.
Herbert
(D.S.C. Mar. 18, 2014).
v.
Treaster,
No.
3:13-cv-00262-JFA
We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials
before
this
court
and
argument
would
not
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?