Robert Herbert v. Benjamin Treaster

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:13-cv-00262-JFA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999421997]. Mailed to: Robert Herbert. [14-6496]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-6496 Doc: 17 Filed: 08/25/2014 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-6496 ROBERT FLETCHER HERBERT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BENJAMIN F. TREASTER; DARYL SCOTT BARBER, Defendants – Appellees, and SHERIFF JAMES MET; ARTHUR L. MYERS; BRIAN WESLEY JEFFCOAT; DEANDRE BALL; DATRAIL BALL, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (3:13-cv-00262-JFA) Submitted: August 14, 2014 Decided: August 25, 2014 Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Fletcher Herbert, Appellant Pro Se. William Henry Davidson, II, David Allan DeMasters, DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Appeal: 14-6496 Doc: 17 Filed: 08/25/2014 Pg: 2 of 3 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 14-6496 Doc: 17 Filed: 08/25/2014 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Robert Fletcher Herbert appeals the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment to Defendants Benjamin F. Treaster and Daryl Scott Barber in his civil action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012). error. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible district Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the court. Herbert (D.S.C. Mar. 18, 2014). v. Treaster, No. 3:13-cv-00262-JFA We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?