John Baccus v. Bristow Marchant
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion for judicial notice [999350011-2]; denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999337841-2]; denying Motion for an adversary and conformity due process hearing [999330763-2] Originating case number: 8:13-cv-03439-JFA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999404578]. Mailed to: John Baccus. [14-6517]
Appeal: 14-6517
Doc: 24
Filed: 07/29/2014
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6517
JOHN ROOSEVELT BACCUS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
BRISTOW MARCHANT; DAVID C. NORTON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (8:13-cv-03439-JFA)
Submitted:
July 24, 2014
Before FLOYD and
Circuit Judge.
THACKER,
Decided:
Circuit
Judges,
and
July 29, 2014
DAVIS,
Senior
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John Roosevelt Baccus, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-6517
Doc: 24
Filed: 07/29/2014
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
John
Roosevelt
Baccus
appeals
the
district
court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint.
have
reviewed
the
record
and
find
no
reversible
We
error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.
Baccus
Apr. 1, 2014).
records.
v.
Marchant,
No.
8:13-cv-03439-JFA
(D.S.C.
We grant Baccus’s motion for judicial notice of
We deny all other outstanding motions.
We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately
presented
in
the
materials
before
this
court
and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?