US v. Robert Neblett
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:09-cr-00301-HEH-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999404622]. Mailed to: appellant. [14-6527]
Appeal: 14-6527
Doc: 9
Filed: 07/29/2014
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6527
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ROBERT TOMONE NEBLETT,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (3:09-cr-00301-HEH-1)
Submitted:
July 24, 2014
Before FLOYD and
Circuit Judge.
THACKER,
Decided:
Circuit
Judges,
and
July 29, 2014
DAVIS,
Senior
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Tomone Neblett, Appellant Pro Se.
Jessica D. Aber,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Angela Mastandrea-Miller,
Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-6527
Doc: 9
Filed: 07/29/2014
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Robert
Tomone
Neblett
appeals
the
district
court’s
order denying his motion to compel the Government to file a
Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35(b) motion for reduction of
sentence based on substantial assistance.
record and find no reversible error.
We have reviewed the
Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court.
United States v.
Neblett, No. 3:09-cr-00301-HEH-1 (E.D. Va. Mar. 25, 2014).
dispense
with
contentions
are
oral
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
the
facts
We
and
legal
materials
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?