US v. Robert Neblett

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:09-cr-00301-HEH-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999404622]. Mailed to: appellant. [14-6527]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-6527 Doc: 9 Filed: 07/29/2014 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-6527 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ROBERT TOMONE NEBLETT, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:09-cr-00301-HEH-1) Submitted: July 24, 2014 Before FLOYD and Circuit Judge. THACKER, Decided: Circuit Judges, and July 29, 2014 DAVIS, Senior Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Tomone Neblett, Appellant Pro Se. Jessica D. Aber, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Angela Mastandrea-Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 14-6527 Doc: 9 Filed: 07/29/2014 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Robert Tomone Neblett appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to compel the Government to file a Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35(b) motion for reduction of sentence based on substantial assistance. record and find no reversible error. We have reviewed the Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Neblett, No. 3:09-cr-00301-HEH-1 (E.D. Va. Mar. 25, 2014). dispense with contentions are oral argument adequately because presented in the the facts We and legal materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?