Isaac Patterson v. William Muse

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:12-cv-00498-RAJ-TEM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999461013]. Mailed to: Patterson. [14-6594]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-6594 Doc: 14 Filed: 10/23/2014 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-6594 ISAAC PATTERSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WILLIAM MUSE; KAREN D. BROWN; RITA J ANGELONE; MINOR F. STONE; FREDERICK M QUAYLE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:12-cv-00498-RAJ-TEM) Submitted: October 21, 2014 Decided: October 23, 2014 Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Isaac Patterson, Appellant Pro Se. James Milburn Isaacs, Jr., OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 14-6594 Doc: 14 Filed: 10/23/2014 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Isaac Patterson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. have reviewed the record and find no reversible We error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Patterson v. Muse, No. 2:12-cv-00498-RAJ-TEM (E.D. Va. Mar. 31, 2014). facts and materials legal before We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately this and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?