Isaac Patterson v. William Muse
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:12-cv-00498-RAJ-TEM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999461013]. Mailed to: Patterson. [14-6594]
Appeal: 14-6594
Doc: 14
Filed: 10/23/2014
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6594
ISAAC PATTERSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WILLIAM MUSE; KAREN D. BROWN; RITA J ANGELONE; MINOR F.
STONE; FREDERICK M QUAYLE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (2:12-cv-00498-RAJ-TEM)
Submitted:
October 21, 2014
Decided:
October 23, 2014
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Isaac Patterson, Appellant Pro Se.
James Milburn Isaacs, Jr.,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-6594
Doc: 14
Filed: 10/23/2014
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Isaac
Patterson
appeals
the
district
court’s
order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint.
have
reviewed
the
record
and
find
no
reversible
We
error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.
Patterson v. Muse, No. 2:12-cv-00498-RAJ-TEM (E.D. Va.
Mar. 31, 2014).
facts
and
materials
legal
before
We dispense with oral argument because the
contentions
are
adequately
this
and
argument
court
presented
would
not
in
the
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?