Chauncey Williams v. J. E. Park

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:13-cv-00823-TSE-IDD. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999423018]. Mailed to: Chauncey Williams. [14-6601]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-6601 Doc: 12 Filed: 08/26/2014 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-6601 CHAUNCEY A. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. J. E. PARKS, Director, Offender Management Services; M. L. TAYLOR, Chief of Operations, Central Region; D. B. EVERETT, Chief of Operations, Eastern Region.; G. ROBINSON, Manager, Ombudsman Services Unit; H. J. PONTON, JR., Warden, (N.C.C.); R. WOODSON, Eastern Region Ombudsman; M. M. VARGO, Warden (SSX II), Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:13-cv-00823-TSE-IDD) Submitted: August 21, 2014 Decided: August 26, 2014 Before SHEDD, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Chauncey A. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 14-6601 Doc: 12 Filed: 08/26/2014 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Chauncey A. Williams appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2012), and denying his motion to amend the judgment. error. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Williams v. Parks, No. 1:13-cv-00823-TSE-IDD (E.D. Va. Mar. 18, 2014 & Apr. 3, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?