Anthony Hoover v. Faye Daniel

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999348697-2]; denying Motion for other relief [999363614-2] Originating case number: 5:13-ct-03096-BO Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999404611]. Mailed to: Hoover. [14-6606]

Appeal: 14-6606

Doc: 16

Filed: 07/29/2014

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6606

ANTHONY HOOVER,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
and
DAVID SCOTT,
Plaintiff,
v.
FAYE DANIELS; JAMES MCKNIGHT; ANTHONY FLORENCE; VICKI L.
COURTNEY,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:13-cr-03096-BO)

Submitted:

July 24, 2014

Before FLOYD and
Circuit Judge.

THACKER,

Decided:

Circuit

Judges,

and

July 29, 2014

DAVIS,

Senior

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Leon Hoover, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-6606

Doc: 16

Filed: 07/29/2014

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Anthony

Leon

Hoover

appeals

the

district

court’s

orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28
U.S.C.

§ 1915(e)(2)(B)

reconsideration.

(2012)

and

denying

his

motion

for

We have reviewed the record and find that this

appeal is frivolous.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the

reasons stated by the district court.

Hoover v. Daniels, No.

5:13-ct-03096-BO (E.D.N.C. Apr. 4 & 16, 2014).

We deny Hoover’s

motions to appoint counsel and for amendment.

We dispense with

oral

contentions

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

and

materials

legal
before

this

court

are
and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2