Monte DeCarlos Winston v. United States Attorney General
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999381172-2] Originating case number: 3:14-cv-00182-REP-MHL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999460929]. Mailed to: Winston. [14-6621]
Appeal: 14-6621
Doc: 14
Filed: 10/23/2014
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6621
MONTE DECARLOS WINSTON,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
Robert E. Payne, Senior
District Judge. (3:14-cv-00182-REP-MHL)
Submitted:
October 21, 2014
Decided:
October 23, 2014
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Monte Decarlos Winston, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-6621
Doc: 14
Filed: 10/23/2014
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Monte
the
district
Decarlos
court’s
order
§ 2241 (2012) petition.
reversible
error.
Winston,
a
denying
federal
relief
prisoner,
on
his
appeals
28
U.S.C.
We have reviewed the record and find no
Accordingly,
although
we
grant
leave
to
proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court.
See Winston v. U.S. Attorney Gen., 3:14-cv-
00182-REP-MHL (E.D. Va. Apr. 10, 2014).
We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?