Monte DeCarlos Winston v. United States Attorney General

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999381172-2] Originating case number: 3:14-cv-00182-REP-MHL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999460929]. Mailed to: Winston. [14-6621]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-6621 Doc: 14 Filed: 10/23/2014 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-6621 MONTE DECARLOS WINSTON, Petitioner - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:14-cv-00182-REP-MHL) Submitted: October 21, 2014 Decided: October 23, 2014 Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Monte Decarlos Winston, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 14-6621 Doc: 14 Filed: 10/23/2014 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Monte the district Decarlos court’s order § 2241 (2012) petition. reversible error. Winston, a denying federal relief prisoner, on his appeals 28 U.S.C. We have reviewed the record and find no Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Winston v. U.S. Attorney Gen., 3:14-cv- 00182-REP-MHL (E.D. Va. Apr. 10, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?