Billy Tedder v. Sergeant Johnson
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999435615-2]; denying Motion for transcript at government expense [999435615-3] Originating case number: 8:09-cv-03067-JMC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999444646]. Mailed to: Billy Tedder. [14-6622]
Appeal: 14-6622
Doc: 14
Filed: 09/29/2014
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6622
BILLY TEDDER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SERGEANT JOHNSON,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
MARGRETT BELL, Associate Warden of Security; WARDEN ANTHONY
PADULA; DIRECTOR JOHN OZMINT, South Carolina Department of
Corrections,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson.
J. Michelle Childs, District
Judge. (8:09-cv-03067-JMC)
Submitted:
September 16, 2014
Decided:
September 29, 2014
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, WYNN, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON,
Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Billy Joe Tedder, Appellant Pro Se.
Walker Heinitsh Willcox,
WILLCOX BUYCK & WILLIAMS, PA, Florence, South Carolina, for
Appeal: 14-6622
Doc: 14
Filed: 09/29/2014
Pg: 2 of 3
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 14-6622
Doc: 14
Filed: 09/29/2014
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Billy Joe Tedder appeals the district court’s judgment
entered after a jury found for the defendant on Tedder’s 42
U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint in which he alleged excessive
force.
error.
We
have
reviewed
the
record
Accordingly, we affirm.
preparation
of
motion
appointment
for
a
transcript
of
and
find
no
reversible
We deny Tedder’s motion for the
at
government
counsel.
We
expense,
dispense
and
with
his
oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?