Dennis Gallipeau v. Linda Mickens-Ham

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for abeyance (Local Rule 12(d)) [999390991-2]; denying Motion to consolidate case (Local Rule 12(b)) [999390991-3] Originating case number: 3:09-cv-01883-TMC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999427991]. Mailed to: D. Gallipeau. [14-6626]

Appeal: 14-6626

Doc: 15

Filed: 09/03/2014

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6626

DENNIS GALLIPEAU,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
LINDA MICKENS-HAM,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
JANE DOE; LEXINGTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER; OFFICER MACK,
Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia.
Timothy M. Cain, District Judge.
(3:09-cv-01883-TMC)

Submitted:

August 28, 2014

Decided:

September 3, 2014

Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dennis Gallipeau, Appellant Pro Se.
Justin
DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South
Appellee.

Tyler Bagwell,
Carolina, for

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-6626

Doc: 15

Filed: 09/03/2014

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Dennis
denying

Gallipeau

relief

dismissing

on

his

42

his

appeals

motion

U.S.C.

the

to

§ 1983

district

reconsider

(2012)

court’s
a

affirm

for

the

reasons

stated

by

prior

order

complaint.

reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
we

order

the

We

have

Accordingly,

district

court.

Gallipeau v. Mickens-Ham, No. 3:09-cv-01883-TMC (D.S.C. Apr. 9,
2014).

We

deny

Gallipeau’s

motion

to

place

this

case

in

abeyance, and his motion to consolidate, and we dispense with
oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

and

materials

legal
before

contentions
this

court

are
and

argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2