James Brawner v. Leroy Cartledge

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:12-cv-01889-RMG Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999461112]. Mailed to: James Brawner. [14-6643]

Appeal: 14-6643

Doc: 22

Filed: 10/23/2014

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6643

JAMES RANDALL BRAWNER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
LEROY CARTLEDGE, sued in his individual capacity; STEVEN
LEWIS, sued in his individual capacity; J. PARKER, sued in
his individual capacity; FRANK MURSIER, sued in his
individual capacity; HARRISON, sued in his individual
capacity; JAMES SLIGH, sued in his individual capacity;
DENNIS PATTERSON, sued in his individual capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Orangeburg.
Richard Mark Gergel, District
Judge. (5:12-cv-01889-RMG)

Submitted:

October 21, 2014

Decided:

October 23, 2014

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Randall Brawner, Appellant Pro Se.
Andrew Lindemann,
DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-6643

Doc: 22

Filed: 10/23/2014

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
James

Randall

Brawner

appeals

the

district

court’s

order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to grant
Defendants’
§ 1983

summary

(2012)

judgment

complaint

motion

against

them.

record and find no reversible error.
district court’s judgment.
cv-01889-RMG

(D.S.C.

Mar.

on

Brawner’s
We

have

42

U.S.C.

reviewed

the

Accordingly, we affirm the

See Brawner v. Cartledge, No. 5:1211,

2014).

We

dispense

with

oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2