Dennis Dillard v. Terry O'Brien
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999395795-2] Originating case number: 5:13-cv-00128-FPS-JES Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999470445]. Mailed to: Dillard. [14-6659]
Appeal: 14-6659
Doc: 26
Filed: 11/06/2014
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6659
DENNIS J. DILLARD,
Petitioner – Appellant,
v.
TERRY
O’BRIEN;
STEVEN S. NEFF,
UNITED
STATES
PENITENTIARY
HAZELTON;
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Wheeling.
Frederick P. Stamp,
Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:13-cv-00128-FPS-JES)
Submitted:
October 29, 2014
Decided:
November 6, 2014
Before SHEDD and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dennis J. Dillard, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-6659
Doc: 26
Filed: 11/06/2014
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Dennis
district
magistrate
(2012)
J.
court’s
order
judge
and
petition.
reversible
Dillard,
federal
accepting
denying
We
error.
a
have
the
relief
reviewed
Accordingly,
prisoner,
appeals
recommendation
on
his
the
28
record
although
we
of
U.S.C.
and
grant
the
the
§ 2241
find
no
leave
to
proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court.
Dillard v. O’Brien, No. 5:13-cv-00128-FPS-
JES (N.D.W. Va. Apr. 17, 2014).
In addition, we note that
Dillard has waived the review of any issues not contained in his
informal brief.
See 4th Cir. R. 34(b).
We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?