Dennis Dillard v. Terry O'Brien

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999395795-2] Originating case number: 5:13-cv-00128-FPS-JES Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999470445]. Mailed to: Dillard. [14-6659]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-6659 Doc: 26 Filed: 11/06/2014 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-6659 DENNIS J. DILLARD, Petitioner – Appellant, v. TERRY O’BRIEN; STEVEN S. NEFF, UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY HAZELTON; Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:13-cv-00128-FPS-JES) Submitted: October 29, 2014 Decided: November 6, 2014 Before SHEDD and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dennis J. Dillard, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 14-6659 Doc: 26 Filed: 11/06/2014 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Dennis district magistrate (2012) J. court’s order judge and petition. reversible Dillard, federal accepting denying We error. a have the relief reviewed Accordingly, prisoner, appeals recommendation on his the 28 record although we of U.S.C. and grant the the § 2241 find no leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Dillard v. O’Brien, No. 5:13-cv-00128-FPS- JES (N.D.W. Va. Apr. 17, 2014). In addition, we note that Dillard has waived the review of any issues not contained in his informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?