Roderick English v. Fazal Khan

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:13-cv-02857-JFA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999404881]. Mailed to: English. [14-6688]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-6688 Doc: 8 Filed: 07/29/2014 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-6688 RODERICK ENGLISH, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. FAZAL KHAN; RICHARD S. JOHNSON; LPN MICHELLE D. FOX; SYLVIA ROBERTS; AMORET FLOYD; JOANN BOARDS; ADRIENNE N. LOGAN; TERRIE LEONARD; RN POWELL; EILEEN DELANY; DONNA LO’DANIEL; T. BENJAMIN ARTHUR E. MCLAMB; ANN M. DWYER; PRAVIN R. PATEL, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (1:13-cv-02857-JFA) Submitted: July 24, 2014 Before FLOYD and Circuit Judge. THACKER, Decided: Circuit Judges, and July 29, 2014 DAVIS, Senior Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Roderick Jerome English, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 14-6688 Doc: 8 Filed: 07/29/2014 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Roderick Jerome English appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. have reviewed the record and find no reversible We error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. English 2014). legal before v. Khan, 1:13-cv-02857-JFA (D.S.C. Apr. 1, We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions this court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?