Roderick English v. Dr. Beverly Wood
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:13-cv-02677-JFA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999404894]. Mailed to: English. [14-6692]
Appeal: 14-6692
Doc: 8
Filed: 07/29/2014
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6692
RODERICK ENGLISH,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
DOCTOR BEVERLY A. WOOD; DONIKIAS GRAY; COUNSELORS MADDOX;
WILLIAM R. BYARS, JR.; DOCTOR NOCHO PEREZ; ASHLEY SHARMANE
WASHINGTON; DOCTOR FERLUATO,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Aiken.
Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (1:13-cv-02677-JFA)
Submitted:
July 24, 2014
Before FLOYD and
Circuit Judge.
THACKER,
Decided:
Circuit
Judges,
and
July 29, 2014
DAVIS,
Senior
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Roderick Jerome English, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-6692
Doc: 8
Filed: 07/29/2014
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Roderick Jerome English appeals the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint.
have
reviewed
the
record
and
find
no
reversible
We
error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.
English v. Wood, No. 1:13-cv-02677-JFA (D.S.C. Apr. 1,
2014).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal
before
contentions
this
court
are
adequately
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
aid
the
the
materials
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?