Roderick English v. Edward Longshore, II

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to amend/correct [999394408-2] Originating case number: 1:13-cv-02792-JFA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999422897]. Mailed to: English. [14-6694]

Appeal: 14-6694

Doc: 14

Filed: 08/26/2014

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6694

RODERICK JEROME ENGLISH,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
EDWARD WOODROW LONGSHORE, II,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Aiken.
Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (1:13-cv-02792-JFA)

Submitted:

August 21, 2014

Decided:

August 26, 2014

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roderick Jerome English, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-6694

Doc: 14

Filed: 08/26/2014

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Roderick Jerome English appeals the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012).
reversible error.

We have reviewed the record and find no

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court.

English v. Longshore, No. 1:13-cv-02792-

JFA (D.S.C. Apr. 1, 2014).

We also deny English’s “motion to

amend post conviction relief.”

We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2