US v. Mark Clifton

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 7:96-cr-00062-H-2 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999445629]. Mailed to: Mark Clifton. [14-6755]

Appeal: 14-6755

Doc: 7

Filed: 09/30/2014

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6755

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MARK CLIFTON,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Wilmington.
Malcolm J. Howard,
Senior District Judge. (7:96-cr-00062-H-2)

Submitted:

September 25, 2014

Decided:

September 30, 2014

Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mark Clifton, Appellant Pro Se. Seth Morgan Wood, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-6755

Doc: 7

Filed: 09/30/2014

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Mark

Clifton

appeals

the

district

court’s

order

denying his petition for a writ of error coram nobis and his
supplemental petition alternatively seeking relief pursuant to a
writ of audita querela.
reversible error.

We have reviewed the record and find no

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Clifton, No. 7:96-cr00062-H-2

(E.D.N.C.

Apr.

15,

2014).

We

dispense

with

oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2