Mauricio Weber v. Corporal Santo

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for restraining order [999402175-2]; denying Motion for injunctive relief pending appeal (FRAP 8) [999402171-2]; denying Motion for stay pending appeal [999402164-2] Originating case number: 8:12-cv-03349-TMC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999422944]. Mailed to: Mauricio Weber. [14-6783]

Appeal: 14-6783

Doc: 20

Filed: 08/26/2014

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6783

MAURICIO E. WEBER,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
CORPORAL SANTOS,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
CAPTAIN ARLETTE JONES; LIEUTENANT HANKINS; CAPTAIN HAM;
LIEUTENANT
COLLINS;
OFFICER
REEVES;
CORPORAL
RHONDA
LATIMER; MAJOR GARRY L. BRYANT; OFFICER ASHE; DEPUTY
HOLDEN; LIEUTENANT HAYDEN; LIEUTENANT LOOPER; SERGEANT
TRIBBLE,
Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson.
Timothy M. Cain, District Judge.
(8:12-cv-03349-TMC)

Submitted:

August 21, 2014

Decided:

August 26, 2014

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mauricio E. Weber, Appellant Pro Se. Steven
MCDONALD, PATRICK, POSTON, HEMPHILL & ROPER,

Michael Pruitt,
LLC, Greenwood,

Appeal: 14-6783

Doc: 20

Filed: 08/26/2014

Pg: 2 of 3

South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 14-6783

Doc: 20

Filed: 08/26/2014

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Mauricio E. Weber appeals the district court’s order
dismissing

his

action

asserting

civil

claims for failure to prosecute.

rights

and

state

On appeal, we confine our

review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief.
Cir.

R.

34(b).

Because

law

Weber’s

informal

brief

See 4th
does

not

challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Weber
has

forfeited

appellate

review

of

the

court’s

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment.

order.
We deny

Weber’s motions for stay pending appeal, injunctive relief, and
a restraining order.
facts

and

materials

legal
before

We dispense with oral argument because the

contentions

are

adequately

this

and

argument

court

presented

would

not

in

the

aid

the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3