Mauricio Weber v. Corporal Santo

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for restraining order [999402175-2]; denying Motion for injunctive relief pending appeal (FRAP 8) [999402171-2]; denying Motion for stay pending appeal [999402164-2] Originating case number: 8:12-cv-03349-TMC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999422944]. Mailed to: Mauricio Weber. [14-6783]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-6783 Doc: 20 Filed: 08/26/2014 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-6783 MAURICIO E. WEBER, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. CORPORAL SANTOS, Defendant – Appellee, and CAPTAIN ARLETTE JONES; LIEUTENANT HANKINS; CAPTAIN HAM; LIEUTENANT COLLINS; OFFICER REEVES; CORPORAL RHONDA LATIMER; MAJOR GARRY L. BRYANT; OFFICER ASHE; DEPUTY HOLDEN; LIEUTENANT HAYDEN; LIEUTENANT LOOPER; SERGEANT TRIBBLE, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. (8:12-cv-03349-TMC) Submitted: August 21, 2014 Decided: August 26, 2014 Before SHEDD, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mauricio E. Weber, Appellant Pro Se. Steven MCDONALD, PATRICK, POSTON, HEMPHILL & ROPER, Michael Pruitt, LLC, Greenwood, Appeal: 14-6783 Doc: 20 Filed: 08/26/2014 Pg: 2 of 3 South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 14-6783 Doc: 20 Filed: 08/26/2014 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Mauricio E. Weber appeals the district court’s order dismissing his action asserting civil claims for failure to prosecute. rights and state On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. Cir. R. 34(b). Because law Weber’s informal brief See 4th does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Weber has forfeited appellate review of the court’s Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. order. We deny Weber’s motions for stay pending appeal, injunctive relief, and a restraining order. facts and materials legal before We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately this and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?