Kenneth Bryant v. Marie Vargo
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:14-cv-00294-CMH-TCB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999445727]. Mailed to: Bryant. [14-6807]
Appeal: 14-6807
Doc: 16
Filed: 09/30/2014
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6807
KENNETH BRYANT,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
MARIE VARGO, Warden; TERRA
MOORE, Medical Administrator;
S. HICKS, Registered Nurse; CORIZON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
Claude M. Hilton, Senior
District Judge. (1:14-cv-00294-CMH-TCB)
Submitted:
September 25, 2014
Decided:
September 30, 2014
Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kenneth Bryant, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-6807
Doc: 16
Filed: 09/30/2014
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Kenneth
dismissing
Bryant
without
appeals
prejudice
failure
to
the
his
notify
district
42
the
U.S.C.
court
of
court’s
§
1983
his
order
(2012)
complaint
for
change
of
address.
This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final
orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and
collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P.
54(b); Cohen
v.
545-46 (1949).
Beneficial
Indus.
Loan
Corp.,
337
U.S.
541,
Because Bryant may proceed with his claims by
filing another complaint and providing an accurate address, the
order he seeks to appeal is neither a final order with respect
to those claims nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral
order.
Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10
F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993).
appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
Accordingly, we dismiss the
We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?