Steven Bradford v. Jason Clem

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999390787-2] Originating case number: 1:13-cv-02506-WDQ Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999462072]. Mailed to: Bradford. [14-6860]

Appeal: 14-6860

Doc: 10

Filed: 10/24/2014

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6860

STEVEN KARL EDWARD BRADFORD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JASON CLEM, Dr., Medical Director; CARL OLTMAN, Physician's
Assistant,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
William D. Quarles, Jr., District
Judge. (1:13-cv-02506-WDQ)

Submitted:

October 21, 2014

Decided:

October 24, 2014

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Steven Karl Edward Bradford, Appellant Pro Se.
Gina Marie
Smith, MEYERS, RODBELL & ROSENBAUM, PA, Riverdale, Maryland, for
Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-6860

Doc: 10

Filed: 10/24/2014

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Steven
court’s

order

complaint.
error.

Karl

Edward

denying

relief

Bradford
on

his

appeals

42

the

U.S.C.

district

§ 1983

(2012)

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma

pauperis,

we

affirm

for

the

reasons

stated

by

the

district

court.

Bradford v. Clem, No. 1:13-cv-02506-WDQ (D. Md. May 22,

2014).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal
before

contentions
this

court

are

adequately

and

argument

presented

would

not

in
aid

the
the

materials
decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2