US v. Jerry Davi
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 6:03-cr-01092-HMH-11. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999417971]. Mailed to: Jerry Davis. [14-6866]
Appeal: 14-6866
Doc: 7
Filed: 08/19/2014
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6866
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JERRY DAVIS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville.
Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (6:03-cr-01092-HMH-11)
Submitted:
August 12, 2014
Decided:
August 19, 2014
Before NIEMEYER, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jerry Davis, Appellant Pro Se.
Leesa Washington, Assistant
United
States
Attorney,
Greenville,
South
Carolina,
for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-6866
Doc: 7
Filed: 08/19/2014
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Jerry Davis appeals the district court’s order denying
his
motion
recognizing
for
recusal.
that
there
We
is
have
reviewed
no
pending
action
the
in
record
the
and,
district
court, we conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion.
See United States v. Whorley, 550 F.3d 326, 339 (4th Cir. 2008)
(stating standard of review); see also United States v. Sciarra,
851 F.2d 621, 636 (3d Cir. 1988) (disqualification not called
for
when
movants
have
Accordingly, we affirm.
no
pending
action
before
the
judge).
We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials
before
this
court
and
argument
would
not
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?