Michael Goins v. Elbert Pearson
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:12-cv-03494-RMG Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999470461]. Mailed to: Michael Goins. [14-6876]
Appeal: 14-6876
Doc: 12
Filed: 11/06/2014
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6876
MICHAEL D. GOINS, a/k/a Michael Goins,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
INVESTIGATOR ELBERT PEARSON, in his individual and official
capacity; SERGEANT C. LONG, in his individual and official
capacity; CORPORAL COUNCIL, in his individual and official
capacity,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
MIRIAM COCCIOLONE; BERNARD MACKEY, in his individual and
official capacity; JON OMZINT, in his individual and
official capacity,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence.
Richard Mark Gergel, District
Judge. (4:12-cv-03494-RMG)
Submitted:
October 21, 2014
Before NIEMEYER
Circuit Judge.
and
KING,
Decided:
Circuit
Judges,
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
November 6, 2014
and
DAVIS,
Senior
Appeal: 14-6876
Doc: 12
Filed: 11/06/2014
Pg: 2 of 3
Michael D. Goins, Appellant Pro Se. James Victor McDade, DOYLE,
O’ROURKE, TATE & MCDADE, PA, Anderson, South Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 14-6876
Doc: 12
Filed: 11/06/2014
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Michael D. Goins appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint.
have
reviewed
the
record
and
find
no
reversible
We
error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.
Goins v. Pearson, No. 4:12-cv-03494-RMG (D.S.C. May 29,
2014).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal
before
contentions
this
court
are
adequately
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
aid
the
the
materials
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?