Michael Goins v. Elbert Pearson

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:12-cv-03494-RMG Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999470461]. Mailed to: Michael Goins. [14-6876]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-6876 Doc: 12 Filed: 11/06/2014 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-6876 MICHAEL D. GOINS, a/k/a Michael Goins, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. INVESTIGATOR ELBERT PEARSON, in his individual and official capacity; SERGEANT C. LONG, in his individual and official capacity; CORPORAL COUNCIL, in his individual and official capacity, Defendants – Appellees, and MIRIAM COCCIOLONE; BERNARD MACKEY, in his individual and official capacity; JON OMZINT, in his individual and official capacity, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (4:12-cv-03494-RMG) Submitted: October 21, 2014 Before NIEMEYER Circuit Judge. and KING, Decided: Circuit Judges, Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. November 6, 2014 and DAVIS, Senior Appeal: 14-6876 Doc: 12 Filed: 11/06/2014 Pg: 2 of 3 Michael D. Goins, Appellant Pro Se. James Victor McDade, DOYLE, O’ROURKE, TATE & MCDADE, PA, Anderson, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 14-6876 Doc: 12 Filed: 11/06/2014 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Michael D. Goins appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. have reviewed the record and find no reversible We error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Goins v. Pearson, No. 4:12-cv-03494-RMG (D.S.C. May 29, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal before contentions this court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?