Adrian Bacon v. Michael Wood

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 7:13-cv-00565-JPJ-RSB. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999442716]. Mailed to: Adrian Bacon. [14-6893]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-6893 Doc: 12 Filed: 09/25/2014 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-6893 ADRIAN NATHANIEL BACON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. C/O MICHAEL WOOD; C/O WEBB; C/O C. ROSE; C/O K. BRINKLEY; C/O WHITE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, James P. Jones, District Judges. (7:13-cv-00565-JPJ-RSB) Submitted: September 19, 2014 Decided: September 25, 2014 Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Adrian Nathaniel Bacon, Appellant Pro Se. Kate Elizabeth Dwyre, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 14-6893 Doc: 12 Filed: 09/25/2014 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Adrian Nathaniel Bacon seeks to appeal the denial of motions for summary judgment in his action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012). This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 54546 (1949). orders nor The orders Bacon seeks to appeal are neither final appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. dispense with contentions are oral argument adequately because presented in the the facts We and legal materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?