Adrian Bacon v. Michael Wood
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 7:13-cv-00565-JPJ-RSB. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999442716]. Mailed to: Adrian Bacon. [14-6893]
Appeal: 14-6893
Doc: 12
Filed: 09/25/2014
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6893
ADRIAN NATHANIEL BACON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
C/O MICHAEL WOOD; C/O WEBB; C/O C. ROSE; C/O K. BRINKLEY;
C/O WHITE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke.
Samuel G. Wilson, James P.
Jones, District Judges. (7:13-cv-00565-JPJ-RSB)
Submitted:
September 19, 2014
Decided:
September 25, 2014
Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Adrian Nathaniel Bacon, Appellant Pro Se. Kate Elizabeth Dwyre,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-6893
Doc: 12
Filed: 09/25/2014
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Adrian Nathaniel Bacon seeks to appeal the denial of
motions for summary judgment in his action filed under 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2012).
This court may exercise jurisdiction only over
final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory
and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P.
54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 54546 (1949).
orders
nor
The orders Bacon seeks to appeal are neither final
appealable
interlocutory
or
collateral
orders.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
dispense
with
contentions
are
oral
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
the
facts
We
and
legal
materials
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?