Jerome McFadden v. S. Lewi

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 0:12-cv-01627-MGL-PJG Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999482011]. Mailed to: Jerome McFadden. [14-6962]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-6962 Doc: 19 Filed: 11/25/2014 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-6962 JEROME MCFADDEN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. S. B. LEWIS, Associate Warden; FRANK MURSIER, Major McCI; L. CARTELEDGE, Warden at McCI McCormick Correctional Institution, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. (0:12-cv-01627-MGL-PJG) Submitted: November 20, 2014 Decided: November 25, 2014 Before KING and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam. Jerome McFadden, Appellant Pro Se. Brandon Paul Jones, Daniel Roy Settana, Jr., MCKAY, CAUTHEN, SETTANA & STUBLEY, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 14-6962 Doc: 19 Filed: 11/25/2014 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Jerome McFadden seeks to appeal the district court’s text order denying his motion seeking reconsideration of several nondispositive orders issued by the magistrate judge, including orders denying his motions for appointment of counsel and for an extension of time to complete discovery, and an order granting in part and denying in part McFadden’s Defendants’ summary judgment motion. motion to stay This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). seeks to appeal is neither a final interlocutory or collateral order. appeal for lack of jurisdiction. order The order McFadden nor an appealable Accordingly, we dismiss the We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?