Charles Cassell, III v. FNU Dawkin

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:14-cv-00089-FDW. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999557772]. Mailed to: Charles Cassell, III. [14-6997]

Appeal: 14-6997

Doc: 39

Filed: 04/02/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6997

CHARLES M. CASSELL, III,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
FNU DAWKINS, Dr.; DAVID GUINN, P. A.,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Statesville.
Frank D. Whitney,
Chief District Judge. (5:14-cv-00089-FDW)

Submitted:

January 29, 2015

Decided:

April 2, 2015

Before NIEMEYER and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles M. Cassell, III, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-6997

Doc: 39

Filed: 04/02/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Charles M. Cassell, III seeks to appeal the district
court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint
pursuant

to

28

U.S.C.

§§

1915(g),

1915A(a),

(b)(1)

(2012).

Although we conclude that Cassell did not have three qualifying
previous

“strikes”

as

necessary

to

justify

dismissal

under

28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), as the district court found, we nonetheless
affirm for the reasons given by the district court for dismissal
under § 1915A(a), (b).

Cassell v. Dawkins, No. 5:14-cv-00089-

FDW (W.D.N.C. June 16, 2014).

We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2