Lionell Ephraim v. Karen Hogsten

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999409250-2] Originating case number: 1:12-cv-02339 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999443879]. Mailed to: Lionell Ephraim. [14-7028]

Appeal: 14-7028

Doc: 10

Filed: 09/26/2014

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7028

LIONELL E. EPHRAIM, a/k/a Lionel E. Williams,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
KAREN F. HOGSTEN, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, Senior
District Judge. (1:12-cv-02339)

Submitted:

September 23, 2014

Before NIEMEYER and
Senior Circuit Judge.

GREGORY,

Decided:

Circuit

September 26, 2014

Judges,

and

HAMILTON,

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lionell Elijah Ephraim, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-7028

Doc: 10

Filed: 09/26/2014

Pg: 2 of 2

Elijah

appeals

PER CURIAM:
Lionell
orders

adopting

the

Ephraim

magistrate

the

district

judge’s

court’s

report

and

recommendation, denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition and
denying

his

Procedure.
error.

Rule

59

motion

of

the

Federal

Rules

of

Civil

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

Accordingly, while we grant Ephraim leave to proceed in

forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.

Ephraim v. Hogsten, No. 1:12-cv-02339 (S.D.W. Va. Apr.

4, 2014; June 27, 2014).

We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials

before

this

court

and

argument

would

not

aid

the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2