Alonzo Copeland, Jr. v. J. Shrom / RN
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:13-cv-00584-RBS-DEM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999495904]. Mailed to: appellant. [14-7044]
Appeal: 14-7044
Doc: 10
Filed: 12/18/2014
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7044
ALONZO DENNIS COPELAND, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
J. SHROM/RN, Registered Nurse; A. FREEMAN, Registered Nurse;
C/O CLARK, Lieutenant; ESTATE OF DOCTOR WARREN,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
MS. MASSENBURG, ex. Institutional Ombudsman; MS. C. BOONE,
ex. Institutional Ombudsman; MR. R. WOODSON, Regional
Ombudsman; DOCTOR WARREN, Physician/Doctor,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief
District Judge. (2:13-cv-00584-RBS-DEM)
Submitted:
November 18, 2014
Decided:
Before SHEDD, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
December 18, 2014
Appeal: 14-7044
Doc: 10
Filed: 12/18/2014
Pg: 2 of 3
Alonzo Dennis Copeland, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Kate Elizabeth
Dwyre, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond,
Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 14-7044
Doc: 10
Filed: 12/18/2014
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Alonzo
Dennis
Copeland,
Jr.,
appeals
the
district
court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint
as time-barred.
The district court has granted Copeland’s Fed.
R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion, vacated its dismissed order, and the
complaint reinstated.
moot.
legal
before
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal as
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions
this
court
are
adequately
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
aid
the
the
materials
decisional
process.
DISMISSED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?