Anthony Robles-Telas v. Warden Terry O'Brien

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for transcript at government expense [999405431-2] Originating case number: 2:14-cv-00015-JPB-JSK Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999481846]. Mailed to: Anthony Robles-Telas. [14-7056]

Appeal: 14-7056

Doc: 7

Filed: 11/25/2014

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7056

ANTHONY ROBLES-TELAS,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
WARDEN TERRY O’BRIEN,
Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Elkins.
John Preston Bailey,
Chief District Judge. (2:14-cv-00015-JPB-JSK)

Submitted:

November 20, 2014

Decided:

November 25, 2014

Before KING and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Robles-Telas, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-7056

Doc: 7

Filed: 11/25/2014

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Anthony Robles-Telas, a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(2012) habeas petition.
to

a

magistrate

(2012).

The district court referred this case

judge

pursuant

to

28

U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(B)

The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied

and advised Robles-Telas that failure to file timely objections
to

this

recommendation

could

waive

appellate

review

of

a

to

a

district court order based upon the recommendation.
The
magistrate

timely

judge’s

filing

of

specific

recommendation

is

objections

necessary

to

preserve

appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when
the

parties

have

noncompliance.
Cir.

been

of

the

consequences

of

Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th

1985);

see

also

Robles-Telas

has

waived

objections

warned

after

Thomas

v.

appellate

receiving

proper

Arn,

474

review

U.S.

by

140

failing

notice.

(1985).
to

Accordingly,

affirm the judgment of the district court.

file
we

We deny Robles-

Telas’ motion for transcripts at Government expense.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal
before

contentions
this

court

are

adequately

and

argument

presented

would

not

in
aid

the
the

materials
decisional

process.
AFFIRMED
2