Frankie LordMaster v. G. Hinkle

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion under FRCP 60 [999447144-2] Originating case number: 7:13-cv-00506-MFU-RSB. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999460171]. Mailed to: Frankie Lordmaster. [14-7074]

Appeal: 14-7074

Doc: 17

Filed: 10/22/2014

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7074

FRANKIE JAE LORDMASTER, f/k/a Jason Robert Goldader,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
G. HINKLE, Regional Director; MR. JENNINGS, Ex-Warden of
Augusta Correctional Center; BUILDING C/D
SERGEANT;
BUILDING C/D
LIEUTENANT; LT. WHEELER; LINKENHOLKER;
SHIFFLET, a/k/a Shiflett,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
AUGUSTA CORRECTIONAL CENTER PERSONNEL; UNKNOWN; VIRGINIA
D.O.C. AGENTS; OTHER AGENTS OF GOVERNMENT; COMMON FARE:
DEFENDANTS AT ACC; LAW LIBRARY: DEFENDANTS AT ACC; PERSONAL
SAFETY:
DEFENDANTS
AT
ACC
PERSONNEL;
DISEMMINATION:
DEFENDANTS AT OR OUTSIDE ACC; RETALIATION: DEFENDANTS AT
ACC, Cell Search or resultant; RETALIATION: DEFENDANTS AT OR
OUTSIDE ACC, Transfer or resultants,
Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Michael F. Urbanski, District
Judge. (7:13-cv-00506-MFU-RSB)

Submitted:

October 16, 2014

Decided:

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

October 22, 2014

Appeal: 14-7074

Doc: 17

Filed: 10/22/2014

Pg: 2 of 3

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Frankie Jae LordMaster, Appellant Pro Se. James Milburn Isaacs,
Jr., OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond,
Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 14-7074

Doc: 17

Filed: 10/22/2014

Pg: 3 of 3

Jae

appeals

PER CURIAM:
Frankie
order

granting

LordMaster

summary

judgment

to

the

district

some

court’s

Defendants

on

LordMaster’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint and dismissing
without prejudice the claims against the remaining Defendants
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (2012).
the record and find no reversible error.

We have reviewed

Accordingly, we deny

LordMaster’s pending Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion, and affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court.

LordMaster v.

Hinkle, No. 7:13-cv-00506-MFU-RSB (W.D. Va. July 9, 2014).
dispense

with

contentions

are

oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

We

and

legal

materials

before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3