Stanley Moultrie v. William Byars, Jr.
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 9:14-cv-01690-JFA-BM. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999481770]. Mailed to: Appellant. [14-7123]
Appeal: 14-7123
Doc: 12
Filed: 11/25/2014
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7123
STANLEY LEE MOULTRIE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WILLIAM BYARS, JR., South Carolina Department of Corrections
Director; BRYAN P. STIRLING; GOVERNOR NIKKI HALEY; ATTORNEY
GENERAL ALAN WILSON; DEPUTY DIRECTOR ROBERT WARD; SCDC
GENERAL COUNSEL DAYNE HAILE; CHRISTOPHER FLORIAN; ANN
HALLMAN, Agency Grievance Coordinator; MARIA LEGGINS, Agency
Mailroom
Coordinator;
WILLIE
EAGLETON,
Evan
Warden;
ASSOCIATE WARDEN MCFADDEN; MAJOR C. WEST; BETHEA LIEUTENANT
MICHAEL TOMS; MS. BAKER, Mailroom Coordinator; MS. GRAVES,
ECI
Grievance
Coordinator;
PAMELA
MCDOWELL,
Mailroom
Supervisor; LIEUTENANT JAMES MARTIN; SERGEANT H. SIMS;
ASSOCIATE WARDEN BUSH, Lee CI; ASSOCIATE WARDEN NOLAN;
ASSOCIATE
WARDEN
DEAN;
K.
RIVERS,
Lee
CI
Grievance
Coordinator; JIMMY SLEIGH; DEPUTY WARDEN; LIEUTENANT JACK
BROWN; CECIL WILSON; MS. CONYERS, Lee CI Officer; GENERAL
COUNSEL TATARSKY; DEPUTY DIRECTOR MCCALL,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Beaufort.
Bristow Marchant, Magistrate
Judge. (9:14-cv-01690-JFA-BM)
Submitted:
November 20, 2014
Decided:
November 25, 2014
Before KING and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Appeal: 14-7123
Doc: 12
Filed: 11/25/2014
Pg: 2 of 3
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Stanley Lee Moultrie, Appellant Pro Se.
Jerome Scott Kozacki,
WILLCOX BUYCK & WILLIAMS, PA, Florence, South Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 14-7123
Doc: 12
Filed: 11/25/2014
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Stanley Lee Moultrie seeks to appeal the magistrate
judge’s order denying Moultrie’s motion to alter or amend the
text order denying his request for a default judgment.
court
may
exercise
jurisdiction
only
over
final
This
orders,
28
U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral
orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v.
Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949).
The
order Moultrie seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an
appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
oral
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
the
facts
and
materials
legal
before
Accordingly, we
We dispense with
contentions
this
court
are
and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?