William B. Chappie v. US

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for summary disposition (Local Rule 27(f)) [999439426-2]; denying Motion to remand case [999439426-3] Originating case number: 8:13-cv-01790-RMG Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999462040]. Mailed to: Chappie. [14-7128]

Appeal: 14-7128

Doc: 12

Filed: 10/24/2014

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7128

WILLIAM B. CHAPPIE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson.
Richard Mark Gergel, District
Judge. (8:13-cv-01790-RMG)

Submitted:

October 21, 2014

Decided:

October 24, 2014

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William B. Chappie, Appellant Pro Se.
Barbara Murcier Bowens,
Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-7128

Doc: 12

Filed: 10/24/2014

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
William B. Chappie appeals the district court’s order
accepting

the

recommendation

of

the

magistrate

judge

granting summary judgment to the United States of America.
have

reviewed

the

record

and

find

no

reversible

and
We

error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.
July

Chappie v. United States, No. 8:13-cv-01790-RMG (D.S.C.
21,

2014).

We

disposition and remand.

deny

Chappie’s

motion

for

summary

We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials

before

this

court

and

argument

would

not

aid

the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2