Nathaniel Singleton v. Mr. Nelson

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:12-cv-02985-RBH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999498397]. Mailed to: Nathaniel Singleton. [14-7139]

Appeal: 14-7139

Doc: 9

Filed: 12/22/2014

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7139

NATHANIEL SINGLETON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
FOOD SERVICE OFFICER MR. NELSON; FOOD SERVICE MR. TAYLOR;
FOOD SERVICE MR. CRAZE; FOOD SERVICE MS. JOHNSON; FOOD
SERVICE MS. VENTON; ADMINISTRATIVE FOOD SERVICE BROWN;
ADMINISTRATIVE FOOD SERVICE ARGLINE,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Aiken.
R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.
(1:12-cv-02985-RBH)

Submitted:

December 18, 2014

Decided:

December 22, 2014

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nathaniel Singleton, Appellant Pro Se.
Marshall Prince, II,
Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-7139

Doc: 9

Filed: 12/22/2014

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Nathaniel Singleton appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown
Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
We

have

reviewed

the

record

and

find

no

reversible

error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.

Singleton v. Nelson, No. 1:12-cv-02985-RBH (D.S.C. July

24, 2014).
legal
before

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

contentions
this

court

are

adequately

and

argument

presented

would

not

in
aid

the
the

materials
decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2