Azaniah Blankumsee v. Dept. of Correction

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999426295-2] Originating case number: 8:13-cv-02507-PWG Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999495890]. Mailed to: appellant. [14-7156]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-7156 Doc: 14 Filed: 12/18/2014 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7156 AZANIAH BLANKUMSEE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; BOBBY SHEARIN, Warden of NBCI; A. RODERICK, Case Management Manager; S. JOHNSON, Case Management Specialist, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paul W. Grimm, District Judge. (8:13cv-02507-PWG) Submitted: December 16, 2014 Before DUNCAN Circuit Judge. and DIAZ, Circuit Decided: Judges, December 18, 2014 and DAVIS, Senior Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Azaniah Blankumsee, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith LaneWeber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 14-7156 Doc: 14 Filed: 12/18/2014 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Azaniah Blankumsee appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. have reviewed Accordingly, the we record deny and find Blankumsee’s no motion reversible for We error. appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Blankumsee v. Dep’t of Corr., No. 8:13-cv-02507-PWG filed July 22, 2014; entered July 23, 2014). oral argument adequately because presented in the the facts and materials legal before (D. Md. We dispense with contentions this court are and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?