Michael L. Jones v. Lieber CI
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:13-cv-02034-JFA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999499106]. Mailed to: Michael Jones. [14-7162]
Appeal: 14-7162
Doc: 12
Filed: 12/23/2014
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7162
MICHAEL L. JONES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
LIEBER CI; PERRY CI WARDEN LARRY CARTLEDGE; ASSOC WARDEN
FLORENCE MAUNEY; RICHARD L. TURNER, SCDC Disciplinary
Hearing Officer; D FILMORE, Inmate Classification Committee
Chairperson; SCDC INMATE GRIEVANCE BRANCH HEADQTRS; PERRY
CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; SC DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,
Individually, and in their official Capacities,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (2:13-cv-02034-JFA)
Submitted:
December 18, 2014
Decided:
December 23, 2014
Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael L. Jones, Appellant Pro Se. James Adam Russell, Charles
Franklin Turner, Jr., WILLSON JONES CARTER & BAXLEY, P.A.,
Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-7162
Doc: 12
Filed: 12/23/2014
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Michael L. Jones appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on Jones’ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint.
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
We have
Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Jones
v.
July 23,
facts
Lieber
2014).
and
materials
Corr.
legal
before
We
Inst.,
dispense
No.
with
2:13-cv-02034-JFA
oral
argument
contentions
are
adequately
this
and
argument
court
would
(D.S.C.
because
presented
not
See
the
in
the
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?