Michael L. Jones v. Lieber CI

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:13-cv-02034-JFA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999499106]. Mailed to: Michael Jones. [14-7162]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-7162 Doc: 12 Filed: 12/23/2014 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7162 MICHAEL L. JONES, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LIEBER CI; PERRY CI WARDEN LARRY CARTLEDGE; ASSOC WARDEN FLORENCE MAUNEY; RICHARD L. TURNER, SCDC Disciplinary Hearing Officer; D FILMORE, Inmate Classification Committee Chairperson; SCDC INMATE GRIEVANCE BRANCH HEADQTRS; PERRY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; SC DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Individually, and in their official Capacities, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (2:13-cv-02034-JFA) Submitted: December 18, 2014 Decided: December 23, 2014 Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael L. Jones, Appellant Pro Se. James Adam Russell, Charles Franklin Turner, Jr., WILLSON JONES CARTER & BAXLEY, P.A., Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 14-7162 Doc: 12 Filed: 12/23/2014 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Michael L. Jones appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Jones’ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We have Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jones v. July 23, facts Lieber 2014). and materials Corr. legal before We Inst., dispense No. with 2:13-cv-02034-JFA oral argument contentions are adequately this and argument court would (D.S.C. because presented not See the in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?