Ryan Ramey v. Chief Justice Wm. B. Traxler

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:14-cv-02390-WMN Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999497027].. [14-7208]

Appeal: 14-7208

Doc: 11

Filed: 12/19/2014

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7208

RYAN RANDALL RAMEY,
Defendant – Appellant,
versus
CHIEF JUSTICE WILLIAM B. TRAXLER, JR.; JUDGE DIANA GRIBBON
MOTZ; JUDGE G. STEVEN AGEE; JUDGE CLYDE H. HAMILTON;
RICHARD
SEWELL,
Case
Manager;
SAMUEL
W.
PHILLIPS,
Secretary;
JOHN
DOE,
c/o
Secretary;
JANE
DOE,
c/o
Secretary,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
William B. Nickerson, Senior District
Judge. (1:14-cv-02390-WMN)

Submitted:

December 16, 2014

Before DUNCAN
Circuit Judge.

and

DIAZ,

Circuit

Decided:

Judges,

December 19, 2014

and

DAVIS,

Senior

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ryan Randall Ramey, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-7208

Doc: 11

Filed: 12/19/2014

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Ryan Randall Ramey appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012).
reversible error.

We have reviewed the record and find no

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court.

Ramey v. Chief Justice Wm. B. Traxler,

No. 1:14-cv-02390-WMN (D. Md. Aug. 18, 2014).

We dispense with

oral

contentions

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

and

materials

legal
before

this

court

are
and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2