Kenneth White v. Wells Fargo Bank
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:13-cv-24248 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999535179]. Mailed to: Kenneth A. White. [14-7220]
Appeal: 14-7220
Doc: 34
Filed: 02/25/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7220
KENNETH A. WHITE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WELLS FARGO BANK; BANK OF AMERICA/COUNTRYWIDE
PAYMENT PROCESSING; DOUGLAS PUNCHAK,
MORTGAGE
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Bluefield.
Irene C. Berger,
District Judge. (1:13-cv-24248)
Submitted:
February 20, 2015
Decided:
February 25, 2015
Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kenneth A. White, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Douglas Patterson,
NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH, LLP, Columbia, South
Carolina; Andrew Boyd Bowman, Kelli A. Burns, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP,
Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-7220
Doc: 34
Filed: 02/25/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
White
the
PER CURIAM:
Kenneth
accepting
A.
the
appeals
recommendation
of
the
district
court’s
magistrate
order
judge
and
dismissing his civil action alleging violations of the Fair Debt
Collection Practices Act and the Truth In Lending Act.
We have
reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal and
find
no
reversible
error.
Accordingly,
reasons stated by the district court.
we
affirm
for
the
White v. Wells Fargo
Bank, No. 1:13-cv-24248 (S.D. W. Va. Aug. 7, 2014).
We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately
presented
in
the
materials
before
this
court
and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?