Leon Cheatham v. William Muse
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:13-cv-00320-CMH-TRJ Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999496946]. Mailed to: L. Cheatham. [14-7221]
Appeal: 14-7221
Doc: 11
Filed: 12/19/2014
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7221
LEON CHEATHAM,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
WILLIAM MUSE, Chairman, Virginia Parole Board;
CLARK, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections,
HAROLD
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
Claude M. Hilton, Senior
District Judge. (1:13-cv-00320-CMH-TRJ)
Submitted:
December 16, 2014
Before DUNCAN
Circuit Judge.
and
DIAZ,
Circuit
Decided:
Judges,
December 19, 2014
and
DAVIS,
Senior
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Leon Cheatham, Appellant Pro Se. James Milburn Isaacs, Jr.,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-7221
Doc: 11
Filed: 12/19/2014
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Leon
Cheatham
seeks
to
appeal
the
district
court’s
order denying his motions for appointment of counsel and for
discovery.
This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final
orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and
collateral
orders,
54(b); Cohen
v.
545-46 (1949).
28
U.S.C.
Beneficial
§ 1292
Indus.
(2012);
Loan
Fed.
Corp.,
337
R.
Civ.
U.S.
P.
541,
The order Cheatham seeks to appeal is neither a
final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
dispense
with
contentions
are
oral
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
the
facts
We
and
legal
materials
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?