Azaniah Blankumsee v. Bobby Shearin
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999459199-2] Originating case number: 8:13-cv-02658-PWG Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999523374]. Mailed to: Azaniah Blankumsee. [14-7225]
Appeal: 14-7225
Doc: 17
Filed: 02/04/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7225
AZANIAH BLANKUMSEE,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
BOBBY P. SHEARIN, Warden of North Branch Correctional
Institutions; GREG FLURY, P.A., Medical Staff at N.B.C.I.;
COLIN OTEY, M.D., Care Provider at N.B.C.I.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Paul W. Grimm, District Judge.
(8:13-cv-02658-PWG)
Submitted:
December 15, 2014
Decided:
February 4, 2015
Before KING, GREGORY, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Azaniah
Blankumsee,
Appellant
Pro
Se.
Stephanie
Judith
Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland;
Gina Marie Smith, MEYERS, RODBELL & ROSENBAUM, PA, Riverdale,
Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-7225
Doc: 17
Filed: 02/04/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Azaniah Blankumsee appeals the district court’s order
denying
complaint
and
requests for counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) (2012).
We
have
relief
reviewed
on
the
his
42
record
U.S.C.
and
§ 1983
find
(2012)
no
reversible
error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.
Blankumsee v. Shearin, No. 8:13-cv-02658-PWG (D. Md.
Aug. 4, 2014).
of counsel.
We also deny Blankumsee’s motion for appointment
We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before
this
court
and
argument
would
not
aid
the
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?