Azaniah Blankumsee v. Bobby Shearin

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999459199-2] Originating case number: 8:13-cv-02658-PWG Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999523374]. Mailed to: Azaniah Blankumsee. [14-7225]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-7225 Doc: 17 Filed: 02/04/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7225 AZANIAH BLANKUMSEE, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. BOBBY P. SHEARIN, Warden of North Branch Correctional Institutions; GREG FLURY, P.A., Medical Staff at N.B.C.I.; COLIN OTEY, M.D., Care Provider at N.B.C.I., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paul W. Grimm, District Judge. (8:13-cv-02658-PWG) Submitted: December 15, 2014 Decided: February 4, 2015 Before KING, GREGORY, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Azaniah Blankumsee, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland; Gina Marie Smith, MEYERS, RODBELL & ROSENBAUM, PA, Riverdale, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 14-7225 Doc: 17 Filed: 02/04/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Azaniah Blankumsee appeals the district court’s order denying complaint and requests for counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) (2012). We have relief reviewed on the his 42 record U.S.C. and § 1983 find (2012) no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Blankumsee v. Shearin, No. 8:13-cv-02658-PWG (D. Md. Aug. 4, 2014). of counsel. We also deny Blankumsee’s motion for appointment We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?