Thomas Matherly v. Warden

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999438701-2] Originating case number: 5:14-hc-02036-BR Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999499165]. Mailed to: Thomas Matherly. [14-7258]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-7258 Doc: 13 Filed: 12/23/2014 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7258 THOMAS SHANE MATHERLY, Petitioner - Appellant, v. WARDEN, FCI Butner I, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (5:14-hc-02036-BR) Submitted: December 18, 2014 Decided: December 23, 2014 Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas Shane Matherly, Appellant Pro Se. Christina Ann Kelley, BUREAU OF PRISONS, Butner, North Carolina; Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Denise Walker, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 14-7258 Doc: 13 Filed: 12/23/2014 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Thomas Shane Matherly, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. reversible error. We have reviewed Accordingly, the although record we and grant find no leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. (E.D.N.C. Aug. 20, Matherly v. Warden, No. 5:14-hc-02036-BR 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?