Kenneth Newkirk v. William Shaw

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:14-cv-00426-HEH-MHL. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999479804]. Mailed to: Kenneth Newkirk. [14-7260]

Appeal: 14-7260

Doc: 11

Filed: 11/21/2014

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7260

KENNETH H. NEWKIRK,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WILLIAM SHAW, Judge/Try Cases; KEVIN P. SHA, Lawyer/Suppose
to Defend Accusers; CARTER PHILLIPS, Lawyer/Suppose to
Defend,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (3:14-cv-00426-HEH-MHL)

Submitted:

November 18, 2014

Decided:

November 21, 2014

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth H. Newkirk, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-7260

Doc: 11

Filed: 11/21/2014

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Kenneth H. Newkirk appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint with prejudice
under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012) and 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)
(2012).
error.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district
(E.D.

Va.

court.
Aug.

Newkirk
19,

2014).

v.

Shaw,
We

No.

dispense

3:14-cv-00426-HEH-MHL
with

oral

argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2