US v. Mike Merzoug

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:10-cr-00131-HMH-2 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999613771].. [14-7278]

Appeal: 14-7278

Doc: 28

Filed: 07/02/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7278

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Respondent,
v.
MIKE AZIZ MERZOUG,
Defendant - Petitioner.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson.
Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (8:10-cr-00131-HMH-2)

Submitted:

June 12, 2015

Decided:

July 2, 2015

Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jonathan A. Bartell, Cleveland, Ohio, for Petitioner.
William
N. Nettles, United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina,
David C. Stephens, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for
Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-7278

Doc: 28

Filed: 07/02/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Mike Aziz Merzoug appeals the district court’s oral order
denying his petition for a writ of error coram nobis.

We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Bereano

See

v. United States, 706 F.3d 568, 575 (4th Cir. 2013) (stating
standard of review for denial of petition for writ of coram
nobis).

Accordingly, we affirm.

We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

- 2 -